A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed loved ones dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their site, bringing about an encroachment with a Special Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result regions are issue to rigid controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very sensitive coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partially crafted, is in the right placement. Their legal staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal arranging disputes, exactly where sights of the sea are both equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the website, according to sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-high water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods, an image which includes because develop into emblematic in the intensity with the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they have been meant to gather Visible proof with the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm water to photograph the internet site became Probably the most placing descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely observed that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected intimately through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt construction pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital minute in the legal timeline.
In the core from the dispute is really a disagreement above boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was accepted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of preparing documents, maps, and conditions connected towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is motivated by concern for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their lengthy-standing connection to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children home in accordance With all the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches on the Specific Location of Conservation and say that each one functions have already been carried out according to Skilled guidance and authorised strategies. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes moving into The ocean all through a storm, tend not to change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions about how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal internet site happens to be a shorthand description for the predicament that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Times write-up about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been involved in community advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really unique Specialist backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous While using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations and René Collier waded as a result of midsection-significant drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting equally the physical fact on the coastline and the symbolic character from the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal approach.
As being the High Court proceedings proceed, the result continues to be uncertain. The court have to identify whether the wall as created complies with arranging permission and whether any encroachment into a Specific Place of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and preparing conditions. Nonetheless the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who must Reside together with one another long following the lawful costs are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the case lengthen outside of that handle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when basic troubles which include environmental defense and house rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of normal elegance and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal concerns. Whether it is going to in the end be altered, taken off, or accomplished as planned will depend on the court’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.